Jon,
As you know, I have never really had a problem with the EULA, given that a) it seemed fair and b) it wasn't all that different than most EULA that I never read -- just click on Accept as there really is no other choice.
But, since the draft was posted, I am just surmising that "non-constructive criticism" will be hard to define. That may need to be more specif. Just my thoughts.
"Examples of such inappropriate behavior include users who don’t pay the required licensing fees, users who behave in a manner that our staff finds to be inappropriate or threatening, users who post non-constructive criticisms about Amazing Charts or related services, and users who use our software or services in a manner other than which they are intended."
I still will stick with my overall feeling of EULA, whic is,
Every
User
Loves
Ac
