Most Recent Posts
no office note but it was billed
by ChrisFNP - 08/15/2025 1:25 PM
Removing a medication
by ChrisFNP - 08/14/2025 9:30 AM
How to get in touch with tech support
by ChrisFNP - 08/08/2025 10:08 AM
Prior approval of meds
by ChrisFNP - 08/04/2025 11:13 AM
License Agreement
by ChrisFNP - 07/31/2025 3:16 PM
July Contribution
by Bert - 07/30/2025 8:34 AM
Using Amazing charts offline
by JamesNT - 07/28/2025 9:53 AM
AC Version 12.3
by ChrisFNP - 07/23/2025 9:51 AM
Member Spotlight
DocGene
DocGene
Cumberland, Md
Posts: 1,023
Joined: February 2011
Newest Members
sne787, Dr. Christine Se, ozonr666, ESMI, It's me
4,597 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rating: 5
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Bert #15075 07/27/2009 7:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 2
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 2
There are 2 ways to use e prescribing, with an EMR and directly.

Directly is very slow and requires time, perhaps it is being done more by staff, but time is still money. Staff are less likely to react to error messages that pop up, lessening the value of e prescribing.

Directly through an EMR is the problems. The programs do not interface with AC well. Is it AC's fault or the vendors? Doesn't matter in our case because it is what we use.

If it interfaced smoothly, then it is an issue of cost. Suuure the feds say you will get a Medicare bonus (I'm in peds, that's nothing) and maybe there will be medicaid bonus (they barely pay us now, I won't hold my breath.)

So that leaves the issue of quality. Are we all so blind that we will miss that many allergies or drug interactions? There is a lot of hype about this but no data.

Yes, e prescribing COULD be better, but it is not set up currently to either be functional or practical for the majority of physicians.

I will ignore those EMRs that have integrated functional e prescribing AND work well, since the cost is absurd and contributes to the overall inflation of the health care budget thus not in the interest of the American public.


Wendell
Pediatrician in Chicago

The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
imcffp #15161 07/31/2009 7:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88
Sky Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 88
One word of caution, I believe Surescripts has changed their corporate approach and are moving towards a revenue model that charges folks for access to any of the information in their databases. So, since they have somewhat of a monopoly on all the RX data for large populations, they want to charge 'per click' when a physician, pharmacy, etc access the dbase.

Anyone know any more about this?

sky

Sky #15181 08/02/2009 1:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,244
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,244
I don't know any more than what you just said, however it comes as no suprise. I will venture to bet that every last one of these companies will do this. Suck us in and then rape us financially, like everyone (EXCEPT DR JON BERTMAN) has done to physicians for years.

They know about the Medicare 2% deal. They want to capitolize upon it. If our 2% incentive becomes a 1% incentive or a 0.5% incentive once we figure in the added overhead charges, WHY BOTHER????

For my small practice, it's not worth a 2% incentive.


Adam Lauer, DO (solo FP)
Twin City Family Medicine
Brewer, ME
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
We pay per click right now but that cost is not given to you. There is a transaction fee that DrFirst pays to surescripts. You the doctor's do not see those fee's that is why we have an annual fee, which believe me is very reasonable!


Jeff Kirkorian
DrFirst Rcopia
866-263-6511 ext 2664
jkirkorian@drfirst.com
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  DocGene, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 86 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Bert 7
beagle 3
imcffp 3
JBS 3
Top Posters
Bert 12,897
JBS 2,989
Wendell365 2,367
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5