I think most of us are used to separate PM with double entry of pt and superbill data. It ain't pretty, but it works and there are wide variety of relatively cheap & proven vendors.

We are hesitant to bet the farm on an untested PM - medfx no one has heard of nor can find any actual products. AC, while we love them and want them to succeed, unfortunately has a mediocre at best track record for rolling out new features on time and bug free. On top of that, if the price is more than we currently pay, it's just a non-starter.

Lastly, ICD10 is coming and most of us need to plan for that now. We'd love to go with AC for integration, but the above factors argue that our safest choice is to skip tight integration, maintain low-cost/proven PM.

AC has to beat 2 of the 3 criteria (price, reliability/known quantity, integration) to get us to jump. Currently they are at 1 (integration promised).

Larry W
internist solo
ohio