Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA #5276 01/30/2008 9:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,889 New York, NY Wayne Member
Wayne Member Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,889 New York, NY	Can't. We're reading it on a computer. We have to byte. (oooh, that was really bad.) Wayne New York, NY Hey, look! A Bandwagon! Let's jump on!

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/24/2008 7:08 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	GAMA	01/24/2008 7:21 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 7:50 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 7:54 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Adam Lauer DO	01/24/2008 8:08 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/24/2008 8:26 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 8:37 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 8:42 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/24/2008 9:01 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Adam Lauer DO	01/24/2008 9:13 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/24/2008 2:58 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Roy	01/24/2008 6:12 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 9:47 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Roy	01/24/2008 11:38 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/24/2008 11:45 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/25/2008 2:47 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 6:44 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/25/2008 7:37 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 8:14 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 8:29 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/26/2008 7:02 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/26/2008 7:22 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/25/2008 8:40 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 8:51 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 9:18 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 9:24 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/25/2008 9:34 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/25/2008 2:50 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Wayne	01/25/2008 3:41 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/25/2008 6:55 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/25/2008 8:48 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/27/2008 5:47 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/27/2008 11:42 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/28/2008 6:26 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/28/2008 11:21 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/29/2008 1:05 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/29/2008 1:08 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 1:19 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/29/2008 1:41 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 1:54 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/29/2008 2:01 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 2:25 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/29/2008 3:09 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 3:23 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/29/2008 5:32 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 9:30 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/29/2008 10:59 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/29/2008 11:24 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/29/2008 11:26 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 12:26 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 12:45 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	soundhealth	01/30/2008 12:58 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 1:06 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/30/2008 1:14 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 1:41 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 1:45 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 1:59 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 2:45 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 2:47 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 2:57 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	soundhealth	01/30/2008 3:01 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 3:14 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 3:14 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 3:25 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 3:32 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 3:36 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 3:40 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 3:56 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	soundhealth	01/30/2008 4:18 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 4:54 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/30/2008 5:29 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 3:04 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 3:16 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/30/2008 3:19 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 4:12 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 5:06 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 8:04 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/30/2008 8:10 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 8:14 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 9:39 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 9:42 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 9:42 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 9:44 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 11:12 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 11:32 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Wayne	01/31/2008 1:09 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/31/2008 1:20 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/31/2008 1:37 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/31/2008 1:47 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	soundhealth	01/31/2008 1:48 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/31/2008 1:57 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Leslie	01/31/2008 2:32 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/31/2008 6:23 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/31/2008 7:48 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/31/2008 9:22 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/31/2008 9:43 PM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	02/01/2008 12:16 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	02/01/2008 12:47 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/30/2008 3:16 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	DONNA	01/30/2008 3:00 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/30/2008 12:54 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	hockeyref	01/30/2008 1:00 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	Bert	01/30/2008 1:11 AM
Re: Double ICD-9 warning	bcmd	01/25/2008 8:36 AM

Moderated by ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365

Link Copied to Clipboard

ShoutChat

Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.