Home Forums Discussions Problems Double ICD-9 warning

Previous Thread

Next Thread

Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert #5253 01/30/2008 12:06 PM Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 971 Arkansas bcmd Member bcmd Member Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 971 Arkansas Originally Posted by bert I did ask Ms. PVC. She said no. That was deflating. Vinny laugh: Hee-hee! Brian Cotner, M.D. Family Practice

Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/24/2008 7:08 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning GAMA 01/24/2008 7:21 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 7:50 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 7:54 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Adam Lauer DO 01/24/2008 8:08 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/24/2008 8:26 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 8:37 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 8:42 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/24/2008 9:01 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Adam Lauer DO 01/24/2008 9:13 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/24/2008 2:58 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Roy 01/24/2008 6:12 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 9:47 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Roy 01/24/2008 11:38 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/24/2008 11:45 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/25/2008 2:47 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 6:44 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/25/2008 7:37 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 8:14 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 8:29 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/26/2008 7:02 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/26/2008 7:22 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/25/2008 8:40 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 8:51 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 9:18 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 9:24 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/25/2008 9:34 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/25/2008 2:50 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Wayne 01/25/2008 3:41 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/25/2008 6:55 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/25/2008 8:48 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/27/2008 5:47 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/27/2008 11:42 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/28/2008 6:26 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/28/2008 11:21 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/29/2008 1:05 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/29/2008 1:08 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 1:19 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/29/2008 1:41 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 1:54 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/29/2008 2:01 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 2:25 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/29/2008 3:09 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 3:23 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/29/2008 5:32 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 9:30 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/29/2008 10:59 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/29/2008 11:24 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/29/2008 11:26 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 12:26 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 12:45 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning soundhealth 01/30/2008 12:58 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 1:06 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/30/2008 1:14 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 1:41 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 1:45 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 1:59 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 2:45 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 2:47 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 2:57 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning soundhealth 01/30/2008 3:01 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 3:14 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 3:14 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 3:25 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 3:32 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 3:36 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 3:40 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 3:56 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning soundhealth 01/30/2008 4:18 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 4:54 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/30/2008 5:29 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 3:04 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 3:16 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/30/2008 3:19 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 4:12 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 5:06 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 8:04 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/30/2008 8:10 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 8:14 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 9:39 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 9:42 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 9:42 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 9:44 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 11:12 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 11:32 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Wayne 01/31/2008 1:09 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/31/2008 1:20 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/31/2008 1:37 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/31/2008 1:47 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning soundhealth 01/31/2008 1:48 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/31/2008 1:57 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Leslie 01/31/2008 2:32 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/31/2008 6:23 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/31/2008 7:48 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/31/2008 9:22 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/31/2008 9:43 PM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 02/01/2008 12:16 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 02/01/2008 12:47 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/30/2008 3:16 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning DONNA 01/30/2008 3:00 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/30/2008 12:54 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning hockeyref 01/30/2008 1:00 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning Bert 01/30/2008 1:11 AM Re: Double ICD-9 warning bcmd 01/25/2008 8:36 AM