|
Posts: 53
Joined: July 2021
|
|
#20801
05/04/2010 5:57 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11 |
I have a canon 2022 i fax/copier/scanner machine. Tried to use this to electronically receive faxes. The problem is the labs usually send many patient faxes in a batch, so I am unable to sort the labs and had to go back to manually scanning them. Would adobe acrobat professional be able to sort these labs by patient name? Is there any other program I should be looking at? Would appreciate any help in this regard. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367 Likes: 2 |
I go through them and print page by page to cutePDF to create individual docutments,labeled by patient and contents. You could export pages with acrobat, I find it is easier to print to PDF.
Wendell Pediatrician in Chicago
The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002 |
Using Paperport, I or my staff unstack the batch then restack for each patient.
Leslie Hospital Employed Physician Who Misses The Old AC
"It's a good thing for a doctor to have prematurely grey hair and itching piles. It makes him appear to know more than he does and gives him an expression of concern which the patient interprets as being on his behalf. "
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11 |
Thanks for the reply. I have never used cutpdf, paperport or adobe acrobat pro. Is it faster to use these and go through electronically filed labs/ faxes. Or is recieving paper faxes and manually scanning them into pts. charts faster? Appreciate any input.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,367 Likes: 2 |
Much faster to use paperport or cutepdf
Wendell Pediatrician in Chicago
The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002 |
Much faster to look at them electronically and saves a lot of trees. But it does make your butt look bigger because you are not always having to get up and chase down the papers.
Leslie Hospital Employed Physician Who Misses The Old AC
"It's a good thing for a doctor to have prematurely grey hair and itching piles. It makes him appear to know more than he does and gives him an expression of concern which the patient interprets as being on his behalf. "
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,897 Likes: 34
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,897 Likes: 34 |
Manually scanning them and filing them is waaaaaaayyyyy slower plus you would have to hire another employee. (Well 0.4) or something. Big waste of time.
I have Adobe Acrobat Pro. Why? Because I always have to have the best. (this is a criticism -- not bragging). All of the 3rd party programs are great. There is a new NitroPDF I have seen. But cutePDF and uglyPDF can all edit and move pages around. Paperport is great for that. Most can't do high tech OCR and separate pages by name. I doubt any can.
Do you have a choice of labs in your city? We only have one, but they still help us with this. Since they bath the labs, it made it difficult when we received faxes to the desktop to know if it were one patient or five. But, now they send a cover page with ALL the names of the patients on them, so the staff knows they have to separate them. They do this ONLY for us. Why? Because we asked, and they want our business. It takes one minute to separate PDF pages.
BOTTOM LINE: YOU HAVE TO HAVE YOUR FAXES COME IN DIRECTLY TO YOUR SERVER OR ONE OF THE COMPUTERS. To print a sheet of paper off, then scan it, then shred the paper is just....well...not efficient or cost efficient.
Bert Pediatrics Brewer, Maine
|
|
|
1 members (imcffp),
24
guests, and
39
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|