Negative: AC, as it exists today, does not value the community's input.
Originally Posted by Mario
Well, it makes me sad to hear that you think that. Given your time here and the breadth of your experience, it also makes me think.
What does it make you think?
Speculations, really. Not necessarily exclusive. It makes me wonder if you know something about the recent partnership that I don't. Or if I'm just being obtuse and can't see what is in plain sight. Or if something not directly related to AC has made dour your perception of AC's appreciation of community input.
___________
Originally Posted by Bert
Wow Praxis! We demoed that for about six weeks. Didn't know it had all those problems. The concept processor and the bell shaped curve just seemed very cool.
I went to the praxis website to learn more about it. One of it's central premises is that templates don't work. I like templates; however, I do recognize that if done incorrectly, they can lead to problems. Just seeing the "templates don't work" line made me a little less receptive to their message.
How well does the concept processor work? It seems to me that it might not work well for the finer details/descriptions that go into encounter documentation.
