I found this in searching for ways to make Core 13 "meaningful"
According to this person, the new requirement is just to "offer" a clinical summary. Does anyone know anything about this?
Details below -- I don't know where to even begin to check out the veracity of this.
If it is true that all we have to do is "offer", and if the "meaningful use" counter is activated merely by clicking on "preview", then it would seem the problem is solved. I agree that the current format is unworkable, unreadable, unhelpful to patients, as well as time and paper consuming.
Tom Duncan
*****Clinical Summaries and Meaningful Use: The Real Story
http://www.valant.com/blog/valant-news/clinical-summaries-and-meaningful-use-the-real-story/Posted by David on 22 September 2011 | 2 Comments
It looked as if Core Measure 13, Clinical Summaries, was going to be the hardest objective to meet in meaningful use. And what's more, patients would in many cases not benefit from, or want to receive, the summary. Well, we have good news! Our contacts at CMS have clarified for us that as long as an offer is made to provide the clinical summary, the measure is satisfied, whether or not the patient declines to receive it. So it's way easier than we thought it would be. This is just another reason to jump in and achieve meaningful use in 2011.
Tags: meaningful use, incentives
Post your comment
Click Here.
Comments
Of course. Our contact?s name is Robert Anthony and he is a Health Insurance Specialist in the Office of E-Health Standards and Services at CMS. We asked him the question: ?Would offering the patient the clinical summary after every visit count as providing a clinical summary for this measure?? Robert?s response was: ?Yes, as long as the offer is made to each patient. However, just posting a sign saying that a summary is available would not be sufficient to meet the measure?
Hope this helps! ****