Site Status
If you see this message. The move to a new host has completed
Most Recent Posts
Medical Billing and Coding Essential
by MZ Medical Billi - 01/06/2025 4:52 AM
Searching ICD 110 Codes
by JBS - 01/04/2025 10:30 AM
Time sensitive MIPS news for 2024 reporting
by JBS - 12/27/2024 10:15 AM
AC Billing Software
by Mnemonic - 12/24/2024 12:16 PM
imported items
by ACZ - 12/13/2024 6:57 PM
Covid-19 vaccine
by Naeem - 12/13/2024 6:51 PM
Member Spotlight
ryanjo
ryanjo
Central Florida
Posts: 2,084
Joined: November 2006
Newest Members
girlfromwebpage, thomastommy12312, Dr M @ EmmFamPr, Stella, BritbikeMorgan
4,588 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 5
JBS Online Content OP
Member
OP Online Content
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 5
I have a thought that may send crazy or overly-materialistic, but I am putting it out there as something to be considered.

We were trained to code visits based on medical complexity and elements of our documentation (for example, including a review of systems etc.). In 2021, revisions to the coding requirements now give us the choice of billing encounters based on the time spent on the date of the encounter.

The time spent on the encounter includes both face-to-face and non-face-to-face time personally spent by the physician. This time includes preparing the note in the EMR ("Documenting clinical information in the electronic or other health record").

If I see a patient and prescribe medication, then the time to write those prescriptions is included in the time spent on the encounter. If I need to spend 5 minutes mapping the meds before prescribing, that is part of the time spent, as well.

If "mapping" pushes my 99213's up to 99214's over the next few weeks, then it is appropriate to bill that way.

It is clear that some number of hours will be spent on mapping and migrating after the upgrade. Are we required to spend those hours in documenting patient care without compensation?


Anyone agree or disagree?


Jon
GI
Baltimore

Reduce needless clicks!
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 15
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 15
Agreed 100% but I'm no coder or Medicare reviewer.

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 254
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 254
If every physician in the US has to do this mapping of meds in their EMR and you get audited, your argument is solid. However explaining to the reviewer that you spent more time on the patient because of mapping the meds will get some quizical looks because they do not know what the mapping of the meds involve. You will have to show them and hope they agree with you. Since it is Medicare you probably would lose anyway; they always win.


---------------------------------------------------
Raj
From (mostly) sunny Port St Lucie, florida
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 828
Likes: 2
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 828
Likes: 2
I wonder if anyone anywhere has ever had to do mapping of meds?

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 15
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 15
ok you made me laugh

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 5
JBS Online Content OP
Member
OP Online Content
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 5
And to invoke Monty Python... now for something completely different.

Mapping medications and their effects on the body


Jon
GI
Baltimore

Reduce needless clicks!
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 3
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 3
Embrace the world of programming and the essential software update. Stay ahead of the game by mastering coding skills and keeping your systems up-to-date with the latest features and security patches.


Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 20 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
JBS 3
Bert 2
ACZ 1
tcosta 1
Top Posters
Bert 12,856
JBS 2,976
Wendell365 2,362
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5