If you see this message.
The move to a new host has completed
|
|
Posts: 2,084
Joined: November 2006
|
|
#75781
08/05/2020 10:27 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 38
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 38 |
Wonder if AC is looking at another portal provider or if there is another portal option.
I just received a notice my Updox fee has gone up by 200%! Not happy, but to add insult I have been after them for YEARS to fix the processing of special characters. Currently when we write a portal message using as an example don't - it saves the message in the patients file as don^&%t. Makes us look so unprofessional and they want more money? Combining their fees and AC fees brings it into territory that it makes sense to reshop our entire EHR/portal system since there are so many out there with features that at least match if not exceed the current configuration. I can see a price increase of 125% but to more than double it in one year? That is when principles step in considering their complete lack of fixing a simple issue like special character handling. Open to any suggestions. Wonder if others have been hit with the Updox fee increase.
Mike Kendall VMP Genetics Atlanta, GA 404.793.7800 ext 708
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 44
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 44 |
Yes I agree:
They raised the monthly price to $209.00. Definitely not worth it. Amazing charts need to look at new partner. We had to forcibly use the updox per Amazing charts and they are raised the price to the highest of all the monthly tech fee we pay.
I will bring it to the attention of Amazing Charts management.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 360 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 360 Likes: 6 |
We need competition here. AC could do it themselves and compete with updox for the fees. Ideally another third party could do it.
Larry Solo IM Midwest
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,973 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,973 Likes: 5 |
We have been Updox users from the beginning, and we love it. The cost has gotten out of hand, though.
The issue for us is that while we like the portal, we find the document management features of the program to be a tremendous time-saver. It would be great for AC to develop their own alternative, but lets hope it is not just a portal, but also the document management piece.
Jon GI Baltimore
Reduce needless clicks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 44
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 44 |
An update:
As others, currently we are using updox paying high price as we are required to have a portal for PCMH etc and have no other choice.
We complained to AC. Peter called our office yesterday, AC is aware of this exorbitant price raise and they are looking at other vendors. Hopefully we will get a different vendor. We wish, hope and pray that we get a reasonably priced vendor soon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2 |
I have always found updox somewhat clunky. I have paid the AC fee to continue the portal, but have not been jumping through the hoops for the government reimbursement, so a portal is not mandatory. Only a small percentage of my patients use a portal anyway. Most of the time we send things through encrypted PDF to email directly.
I would like a smoother, more integrated portal that worked more smoothly, but I no longer expect that Harris is going to expand the product. I hope I am wrong.
Wendell Pediatrician in Chicago
The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2 |
When I googled updox alternatives a few popped up. But will they be economically feasible? How well will they work? This should be interesting
If updox is raising it rates to docs, they are probably raising their rates to AC as well, what will that mean to our annual subscription.
Last edited by Wendell365; 10/03/2020 11:58 AM.
Wendell Pediatrician in Chicago
The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 837 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 837 Likes: 10 |
I couldn't get along without something like Updox -- but there are problems. The ever rising cost is certainly one of them.
It is rather clunky, but the Desktop version is the only way i can sign Medicare documents and certain controlled substance prescriptions when not in the office -- I am allowed to print to Updox and "wet sign" on a touch screen then fax to Home Health or pharmacy. Some agencies will not allow the "signature" that Updox produces -- it is regarded as a signature stamp, and disallowed.
For some reason the Web-based version doesn't allow touchscreen (even though there is a "draw" icon, and that icon does let a left-mouse drag sort of drawing), but it is much faster and more responsive than the Desktop, so I resort to using both.
I don't use the portal -- most of my patient population has no interest in that nor ability to use it. And even the few that do usually call on the phone for more information anyway, so it's double (or quadruple if we have to talk them through signing into the portal or getting signed back in since they forgot since the last time they used it) work for the office staff.
I really wish that AC could bring out a slimmed down version of the EMR without all the nonsense mandated by CMH -- that is going nowhere despite all the puffery about "revolution in payment methods". In reality, the "Quality Measures" are a huge, tragic waste of time and energy -- and in the end are just an add-on to fee for service.
Along with the slimmed down AC, a fully integrated fax system that only functioned as a fax, and didn't try to be all these other things that Updox claims to be would be invaluable.
If we had that, we would have a tool that would truly allow small practices to survive -- the current system is sort of like Poe's "pit and the pendulum" -- a kind of torture that seem to have no purpose except to drive all physicians slowly insane and into the waiting arms of Big Corp Medicine and we can all work directly for United Health Care.
Tom Duncan Family Practice Astoria OR
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,362 Likes: 2 |
I have solved the integrated fax issue with a multifunction printer. I have 2 offices. One uses a Brother MFC the other uses an HP 8610 officejet. With either you print to the fax, it brings up the software that asks for a telephone number (and if you want a cover and how to fill it out) and once you hit send you hear the printer excrete fax noises about 5 seconds later.
I like the HP better because it catches faxes and automatically downloads them as PDFs to the server. The Brother has clunky software that usually requires manually downloading the files then converting them to PDF with paperport software. Paperport is a good manager for the documents, but for us it's primary purpose is to change from (I think) TIFF format to PDF. It will save that to the server group folder and they then import from there. (OK, I know Updox can automatically imports, but it doesn't take long to import for my office).
In fact, when the HP failed (cartridge not recognized, a common problem) I bought another Brother for that office, thinking that they had updated things from my now probably 8 year old Brother in the other office. When staff complained about the clunkiness, I restarted the HP as a fax machine only. I suppose I could have bought another HP but I had already spent the money on the Brother and it is a good printer too, so it prints and the HP faxes. For more money you could by a fax card, but I really don't see the point.
Anyway, I don't use Updox for faxing, my system works well. Few of my patients use the portal. I use NitroPDF (free version) and attach a scanned signature to sign and markup PDF documents (others here like Foxit, but NitroPDF seems to work better for me). That works 95% of the time. About 5% won't take it and I either wet sign and fax or tell them to mail it and I will sign it.One company didn't like my SIGNED signature, I told them to mail it.
So I don't see fax ability as a limitation of AC.
Wendell Pediatrician in Chicago
The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2 |
I am also very unhappy about the huge price increase (from $58 to $149/month). Are there any other e-FAX vendors that can be used with Amazing Charts?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2 |
Yes, mine has increased from $59 to $149/month and I am only using the fax!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 236 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 236 Likes: 1 |
My three provider practice gets 7 - 10,000 pages of faxes a month. Every little bit of reduced clicks and automation helps. The price is pretty reasonable for this amount of document handling, and I think it is in line with most eFax solutions. When Updox was charging per page, my bill would get up to $300. To save money we got a cheap eFax line which e-mailed the fax to an e-mail address. With MS Outlook, I can put in automation to automatically print these faxes to Updox.
Kevin Miller, MD Paradise Family Healthcare Venice, Florida
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,612
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,612 |
IMHO it would be difficult to find a solution that intertwines the e-fax, portal, secure text, and secure video chat features. I figure just a few secure video chats a month more than offsets the monthly cost, and I am usually doing 2-3 per day on average, sure makes the office more efficient. If you find a solution that does all of what updox can for a cheaper cost I would be interested in hearing more about it.
jimmie internal medicine gab.com/jimmievanagon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 87 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 87 Likes: 1 |
In my experience, Updox does value its long-term customers, and they worked with me when I told them I felt like I was being nickeled and dimed. I suggest contacting them before switching to another vendor.
Anne-Marie Family Medicine Whatever Someone Else Isn't Handling Manager
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 126
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 126 |
We have found Updox to be so beneficial for our practice. We use it for everything: secure messaging, our new patient forms, editing, 95% of our faxing goes out through it, and of course, the EHR imports. I just think about how much time and energy it saves me, not to mention resources (paper, toner, wear and tear of our machines).
Trista C.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2 |
Agreed, however Amazing charts needs to have a fully integrated system first. They need to get rid of 2 schedules, the AC schedule and then the PM. Please only one
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128 |
Do you really want AC taking this over? They aren't even putting the resources into AC to keep up with the changes in Windows 10 or fixing the host of bugs we've dealt with for 10 years. I deal with continual crashes and it would be nightmare if Updox behaved like that.
Chris Living the Dream in Alaska
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 191
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 191 |
This is an old thread and been addressed in detail. I got an email from Updox to raise the price again and significantly. Any fresh thoughts and advice? It will cost $400 or more a month just for Updox. Obviously this is in addition to the cost of using Amazingcharts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 661 Likes: 15
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 661 Likes: 15 |
I do not use UpDox. I never have used them and hate that the patient portal is linked to them.
I use a Brother MFC machine currently on a MFC-L5850DW. We have had 4 Brother machines in the past almost 20 years. This current one is almost 4 years old. I use it for faxes in and out and have a couple of scanners for stuff that comes in through the mail. There are other posts on the board about using the Brother machines in place of UpDox. I think the best post goes back several years and was posted by Leslie.
For that price I could buy a new machine every month.
just my 2 cents
|
1 member likes this:
Naeem |
|
|
0 members (),
23
guests, and
15
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|