Most Recent Posts
Version 12.4
by ffac - 07/13/2026 9:24 AM
Population health suggestions
by It's me - 07/07/2026 7:23 PM
Patient portal uploads
by It's me - 07/07/2026 7:18 PM
Depression screening
by It's me - 07/07/2026 7:15 PM
Controlled substance pdmp
by It's me - 07/07/2026 7:07 PM
Med reconciliation check box
by It's me - 07/07/2026 6:59 PM
I need to generate a report
by It's me - 07/07/2026 6:55 PM
Member Spotlight
Ruben
Ruben
Florida
Posts: 141
Joined: February 2014
Newest Members
Lisawilliam, Denton13173, BPeds, PMG Care, KeepingItAnon
4,609 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 300
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 300
Has anyone heard of it? My office manager wants me to consider switching to it. Please give me a few reasons why I shouldn't. I have researched it myself and looks promising. However, I have been with AC for so long (10 years?) I dread changing. Someone give me ammo one way or the other please.

I like AC, but it just does not do what I need it to do. I find myself having a patchwork of programs to do the things I need AC to do. I need an integrated approach. The recent upgrades have been helpful, but not enough. I considered AC's PM, but it does not a good enough way of tracking patients for my purposes.


Gerardo Carcamo
Surgeon
San Antonio, TX
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Gerardo,

I'm inferring that you are looking at the combined EMR and the PM?

We have several practices that use the A-MD Scheduling/PM because it is better suited to multi-location and procedural operations.

I also understand that there will be a means to connect A-MD with AC, which is the preferred configuration for some.

From recent conversations, it appears that the most powerful aspect of A-MD PM is their technology/business rules platform that scrubs billing-coding before submission.

As a system designer, I have yet to see a web-based EMR that wasn't a click-fest. YMMV


Indy
"Boss"

Indy's Blog

www.BestForYourPractice.com
Our Name is Our Creed
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 300
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 300
Thanks Indy. I appreciate and value your input. I am considering getting both the EMR and PM / billing / scheduling "modules" They tell me the ERM is "fully customizable" As a joke I said: "really? then make the ERM look like AC" I would show you the screenshot, but it let me just tell you they did a good job at that. Except they put a past surgical history which is something I have been begging AC to put in for a long time.... Also, they use updox but apparently they "brand" it to their company and is fully integrated? I have not seen it in action so I don't know. It is certainly a lot more expensive. I would instantly double my cost, at least. But sometimes you have to pay to get what you need.


Gerardo Carcamo
Surgeon
San Antonio, TX

Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 877 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
ffac 1
Top Posters
Bert 12,908
JBS 3,002
Wendell365 2,370
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5