|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NewCrop
by Bert - 04/15/2026 6:50 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 12,908
Joined: September 2003
|
|
#62831
09/03/2014 12:08 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65 |
http://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaRe...014-Press-releases-items/2014-08-29.htmlTheir new press release states that "providers that could not fully implement 2014 Edition CEHRT for the EHR reporting period in 2014 due to delays in 2014 Edition CEHRT availability" can attest for Stage one measures (2013 Stage 1 or 2014 Stage one, depending on where you are in your attestation lifecycle). Interesting info, but this is very vague. Can any practice claim that their version was delayed and that they were affected? Will CMS look at AC and say 'they got their 2014 certified version out in time for the 4th quarter 3month reporting window'? Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 837 Likes: 10
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 837 Likes: 10 |
Just my continuing thought that MU is now so far past "meaningful", and so expensive and disruptive to maintain, that I am opting out, choosing the "penalty" instead.
I hope they don't come back at me to refund the MU1 money because I can't make it to Stage 2.
Tom Duncan
Family Practice
Astoria OR
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 255
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 255 |
It appears that you cannot attest to stage one with version 7 unless you've been using the portal to send summaries. We've been printing to Updox, but it is not counting these... Frustrating.
David Lee, MD
IM
Dallas, TX
David Lee, MD
IM
Dallas, TX
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
644
guests, and
22
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
