Posts: 1,023
Joined: February 2011
|
|
#28081
02/12/2011 6:51 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078 |
MANAGED CARE AT ITS FINEST
Just received 3 pages of paper from the "H", dated 2/4/11 asking me why my patient last filled a particular script in December 2010. Patient expired the last middle of December. I wonder if they would consider that an appropriate reason?
Last edited by vroberts; 02/12/2011 7:06 PM.
Vicki Roberts, MD Family Medicine of Southeast Missouri Sikeston, MO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,084
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,084 |
I received a similar inquiry from the same fine insurer, reporting that one of my patients hadn't filled the correct number of doses of his meds, and may be noncompliant. The note went on to explain (for my edification) that noncompliant patients often have more medical complications.
I guess so, since the reason for "noncompliance" was that the patient had died 4 months earlier.
John Internal Medicine
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,546 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,546 Likes: 1 |
There are an awful lot of insurance faxes that go straight to my trash.
David Grauman MD Department of Medicine Commonwealth Health Center Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 106
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 106 |
How about the faxes/letters stating you have not checked labs in over a year. I got one a few weeks ago and looked in the chart and saw the labs I had ordered just a month prior (as well as the ones from 6 months prior). Patient must have paid out of pocket for those labs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487 |
This is absolutely worthless trash. I think this is a way that the insurance company's justify their (is it?) "medical loss ratio". That is they say that this expense is going to paying for healthcare when it is just more administrative mumbo jumbo. I think we can expect more of this with "healthcare reform" as they are required to spend more on healthcare and less on administration. They are trying to practice medicine without a license and are doing a poor job of it with claims data.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,002 |
Go get 'em, guys! I predicted 20 years ago this would occur.
Leslie Hospital Employed Physician Who Misses The Old AC
"It's a good thing for a doctor to have prematurely grey hair and itching piles. It makes him appear to know more than he does and gives him an expression of concern which the patient interprets as being on his behalf. "
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078 |
Wow guys and gals! Great discussion. Most of these go straight to the trash, but somehow "H" got my home address and sent this notice to me there. There is a company that my state medicaid uses to evaluate psychiatric medications I prescribe. I have quit opening those envelopes altogether. Each time I get one, I call the state admin office and tell them that the funding should be going toward psychiatric care that I can refer my patients to, rather than using "civillians" at a desk with a computer program to evaluate me. I think review is good, but most of this is a waste of everyone's time and money.
Vicki Roberts, MD Family Medicine of Southeast Missouri Sikeston, MO
|
|
|
0 members (),
190
guests, and
20
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|