Most Recent Posts
AC Version 12.3
by JBS - 04/24/2025 7:27 PM
An automated process failed: MedsUdates
by JBS - 04/24/2025 7:26 PM
New Feature?
by ChrisFNP - 04/22/2025 6:37 PM
Here is a new one
by ChrisFNP - 04/22/2025 6:20 PM
I won't get help because I am I
by Bert - 04/22/2025 9:09 AM
Pharmacy Request Counter Issues
by Headcase - 04/08/2025 7:04 PM
phantom printer
by imcffp - 04/08/2025 10:26 AM
AC v12 mandatory upgrade
by ChrisFNP - 04/01/2025 9:47 AM
Member Spotlight
Sandeep
Sandeep
California
Posts: 2,316
Joined: April 2011
Newest Members
It's me, Paradise Family, MedCode, MZ Medical Billi, girlfromwebpage
4,593 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
I have discovered and reported a bug that prevents you from transmitting your E-Rx's to the pharmacy if you patient has too many active problems that have accumulated in the SUMMARY SHEET. Apparently there is a limit of 30 active Diagnoses, If you exceed that, the Rx's will not transmit and you will have to print them. This is a real pain esp when working w/ kids, because every vaccination I give has a ICD assoc w/ it and they amass many useless Diagnoses in the SUMMARY SHEET. So for now, you have to "Inactivate" the diagnoses that are no longer current. Apparently Version 5.1 which will be released in Oct will solve this problem.


Neil E Goodman MD, FAAP, FSAM
2500 Starling Street,#401
Brunswick, GA 31520
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487
Thanks for sharing.....that explains why one of my patient's scripts didn't go through earlier this week. It was a curious thing and I kept trying because there was no reason they wouldn't go through but this is clearly the reason.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 5
JBS Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 5
The best work-around is to get easier patients. No more than 5 problems allowed. That is how we specialists handle this.


Jon
GI
Baltimore

Reduce needless clicks!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
LOL. I must be either non-compliant or losing revenue, but we don't use ICD-9 codes for shots. But, then we only use VFC shots.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 81
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 81
Bert,

Don't you bill for administration of the shots?
If you only use VFC shots, what do you do with your insured patients?

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 487
Maybe not allowing so many diagnoses is the governments way of just getting rid of these patients.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
One of the other problems is that the problem list is housed on the computer, so even thought it may be cleaned up on one laptop, it will need to be done for that patient each time it is sent from a different computer.



Vicki Roberts, MD
Family Medicine of Southeast Missouri
Sikeston, MO
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
??? I don't think so. The problem list is on the database of the server. About the only things that are computer specific are the dictionary file and the last note text file.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 531
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 531
Would it APPEAR that it is hosted on the local computer if:
The MA opens the chart, enters the vitals and sends it to me.
I open the chart and complete an encounter including the Inactivation of the obsolete problems.
Then I forward the chart to the MA for an immunization and she opens it on the same computer where it was open for the vitals.
And this is of course all the same day, without turning any computer off and then on again


Martin T. Sechrist, D.O.
Striving for the "Outcome Oriented Medical Record".
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 531
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 531
I checked after I posted that, and it does not work. The changes made on one computer appear on the second computer immediatly.


Martin T. Sechrist, D.O.
Striving for the "Outcome Oriented Medical Record".
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
The only way it will appear differently on two computers or more would be if AC is open to THE SUMMARY page and the other computer deletes a problem. That same problem will still appear on the other computer. As soon as a user changes from the summary screen to another screen such as demographics, that computer is now querying demographics from the server. When you move back to the summary sheet and query that part of SQL (basically refreshing), it will be gone, because it is no longer in the database.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,078
Originally Posted by Bert
??? I don't think so. The problem list is on the database of the server. About the only things that are computer specific are the dictionary file and the last note text file.

I seem to have to change it every time I see a complicated (>5 dx, LOL) pt in a different room or back in my office. I don't usually have the summary page open so I'm not sure what the problem is. It doesn't take that much time to just hold down the inactivate button.


Vicki Roberts, MD
Family Medicine of Southeast Missouri
Sikeston, MO
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Originally Posted by DocMartin
I checked after I posted that, and it does not work. The changes made on one computer appear on the second computer immediatly.
Yes, that is correct. Every time an entry is made and the chart is closed or forwarded, or reopened, the changes are then made immediately to the server. This is regardless of where the file changes took place.


Neil E Goodman MD, FAAP, FSAM
2500 Starling Street,#401
Brunswick, GA 31520
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,873
Likes: 34
Vicki,

The problem shouldn't exist after the diagnoses (it should be around 30) are deleted.

I haven't tried the theory, but are you removing them or inactivating them? I think for this issue, there is a difference.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 82
Yes, I have tried it, and inactivating the extra diagnoses only or remove them (if you wish) , allowed me to go back to the RX writer and send them electronically immediately, w/o any problem.

I prefer not to remove a diagnosis , only inactivate it. Many times there are multiple same dx present spanning years and I like a record of these.


Neil E Goodman MD, FAAP, FSAM
2500 Starling Street,#401
Brunswick, GA 31520

Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 88 guests, and 21 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
ffac 7
JBS 5
koby 4
imcffp 3
Top Posters
Bert 12,873
JBS 2,984
Wendell365 2,363
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5