Most Recent Posts
How to get in touch with tech support
by ChrisFNP - 06/04/2025 10:33 AM
AC Version 12.3
by ChrisFNP - 06/03/2025 2:29 PM
Artificial Intelligence
by imcffp - 06/03/2025 4:46 AM
Search for never seen patients
by AaronWay - 05/21/2025 9:52 PM
Version 12.3 release notes
by imcffp - 05/21/2025 1:19 PM
Eligibility Failures - ACPM
by tcosta - 05/19/2025 3:16 PM
No refills on Schedule 4 Meds
by koby - 05/06/2025 9:24 AM
Member Spotlight
barcafan1990
barcafan1990
Brandon, FL
Posts: 272
Joined: June 2012
Newest Members
It's me, Paradise Family, MedCode, MZ Medical Billi, girlfromwebpage
4,593 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1
JamesK Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1
Amazing Charts 3.6.9 with Buffalo LS-500GL Link Station
Very slow on network. Internet and other application working very good.
Have 4 new laptop running 11mb wireless. The main PC & Link Station are Cat5 hard wired connected to router @ 100mb. I have hard wired a laptop to the router but still get very slow response from AC.

Thanks


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,674
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,674
Hi there,
Can you bump that rate up to 54 or so? Try playing with the setting on the wireless cards on the laptops or what have you. Also check the settings on the router as well. Make sure that all of them are sharing the same basic settings, like rate and channel. Different cards come with different things that one can play with, different softwares, no two being a like it seems. So I have found that one needs to play with those settings a bit to find that perfect "sweet spot" between card and router. That might help a lot.

Also, as I and others have said before, try re-booting the entire network from the modem out. Routers and modems are just chip based little things themselves and they too need to get their instructions straightened out now and again. For what it's worth I've gone thru a few routers over the last few years and nothing has come close to the reliability and stability of the Netgear WPN824 RangeMax we have now. It's the one with the seven internal antenas that constantly adjusts itself to your networks conditions. Don't bother with pre-N or any of those others until the standard is offically released and "standardized" once and for all.

Here's my two cents. I paid two different companies lots of money to install and set up my networks here in the office for my first two routers (Linksis, weak; and D-Link, alright?). When I bought the Netgear I also went to B&N and bought a copy of "Wireless Networks for Dumbies" or something like that, the yellow one. As I read and learned more about the subject I started to look over the settings my supposed "gurus" had set up. I quickly realized that these expensive "gurus" weren't setting up my network half as well nor half as secure as I ended up doing myself. If you're like most AC users you're probably pretty darn smart and willing to tinker with things a bit. Get a good book for a few bucks and set it up good and tight. WPA settings, MAC addressed and the like. The first time might frustrate you a bit, but once you do it a few times you'll certainly get the hang of it. And better than most small and mid-sized "gurus".


"Beware of the Medical Industrial Complex"
"The Insurance Industry is a Legalized CARTEL"
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,874
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,874
Likes: 34
James,

Are you using AC by installing a shortcut to the AC executable file on your "server" computer or have you installed the actual program on each client computer and browsed to the "server" computer? Also, since 3.6.9 is relatively new, I doubt you would need to compact it yet. That only speeds it up a small amount, though.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 22
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 22
We have never had slow chart transfers or retrievals until this version. It takes 1-12 minutes for charts to be forwarded through the email. WAY too long....we can see the patient and be finished before the chart makes it our way.


Glenda J. Clemens, ARNP
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,889
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,889
We are using 3.6.14 and not seeing any problems.


Wayne
New York, NY
Hey, look! A Bandwagon! Let's jump on!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,874
Likes: 34
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,874
Likes: 34
Wow! On any version and up to 3.6.14 and including 3.6.9, our chart transfers would be less than a second. I can't imagine one minute let alone 12. There must be something seriously wrong there. I would definitely call support or Jon on that or maybe try upgrading.


Bert
Pediatrics
Brewer, Maine

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 332
Roy Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 332
Check to see that the time on your computers are synchronized. A 12 minute difference between the computers may cause a delay.


Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 70 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
imcffp 5
koby 2
tcosta 2
JBS 1
Top Posters
Bert 12,874
JBS 2,986
Wendell365 2,366
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5