|
|
|
Posts: 272
Joined: June 2012
|
|
#10264
08/13/2008 7:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 88
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 88 |
I'm relatively new to AC and very new to the UB. I apologize if thhis has been discussed in the past.
My practice has grown enough that I would now like to network AC on the desktop and my laptop so that two of us can access AC simultaneously. I have already set up a wireless network for other office tasks. Any observations or words of advice in general? And specifically, any preference or experience using AC with peer-to-peer versus client-server networking?
Thanks.
Bruce.
Bruce. Internal Medicine (and some Pediatrics) North Central Ohio
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,674
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,674 |
Bruce, Welcome aboard. Yes we have beaten this horse to death more than once. I suggest you do a few searches and see what you can find, and then get back to us if you still have any questions... We're using a decent wireless set up and now it is rock steady even with a few other near by networks. Be a bit anal about your wireless security and you should be fine... Good luck, Paul
"Beware of the Medical Industrial Complex" "The Insurance Industry is a Legalized CARTEL"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,899 Likes: 34
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,899 Likes: 34 |
As everyone knows, I always prefer client/server for everything on a network, but it will perform just as well on a P2P. I would just set it up and start.
Bert Pediatrics Brewer, Maine
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 442
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 442 |
I am using 7 computers on a peer to peer wired nextwork and have never had any problems that a reboot wouldn't fix. I reboot maybe once every 2 months. That being said, I agree Client/Server is technically superior, but I find the P2P very easy to maintain.
...KenP Internist (retired 2020) Florida
|
|
|
0 members (),
34
guests, and
24
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|