The problem is that we are creatures of habit. Most of us are used to using AC as it has been set up and any change will require relearning the program. The new program has to be familiar to the current user and reliable as has been discussed. This is a tall order
Thus the real issue is what are the advantages. As James points out there will be less network issues, but this is both a blessing and a curse. Any downtime in internet means there is no access to the program. Also what if you move to another platform or retire, what access will you have versus now where the program and database are ours (without of course, the add on services such as prescriptions writing and such).
Updox is a band-aid program. It works but is clunky.
Another requirement of a new program would be the ability to interact with other data entities. Of course there is the government requirement of interoperability, but how well do most EMRs actually accomplish this? There are many IPAs, PHOs, and other ventures that require data to show results and while this is possible with AC, it is still a clunky third program solution. The need for this will only increase in the future.
There are less new and existing primary care practitioners and most are affiliated with groups that have already chosen an EMR. How will AC market to the small community that is looking for an affordable EMR? Specialists use the program as well but not as much and again most will be in groups that have already chosen an EMR.
Last edited by Wendell365; 10/29/2024 11:34 AM.
