When I write software to use in my office, and I pay the staff to use it despite its issues, then it is ok for me to say " it is too much of a problem to fix that; learn to live with it." The moment I try to market it, and accept money for it, however, I cede that right. The only acceptable response is "yes Sir/Ma'am. " I don't get to complain that it will be difficult. That is the difference between a personal hobby project and a professionally marketed product.
Very true. The issue is that each feature request has to compete for available developer time and resources. Features that benefit the most clients at one time (e.g. they get the most requests for it) or features that are mandated (e.g. meaningful use) or features that are for compatibility (e.g. Windows 8 and SQL 2012) will always be nudged to the top.
JamesNT
.png "ACUF Donor I")
