I guess I don't want this to be too controversial so I will write it here in this fading and obscure thread. But, I really do have a problem with this whole wiki thing. I definitely have issues with the EULA wiki, but I will save that for another time or maybe not at all.
The original wiki, wikipedia, is a brilliant concept but utilizes the collect audience of five billion people. Now, I am not suggesting that all five billion people edit, but then again probably the same percentage as the 1,000 people on here, right? Like 1%. But, I think you could could write a wiki article on Ronald Reagan and describe him as an extremely liberal democrat who never acted in the movies, and it would be corrected within minutes, and your version would be history, pardon the pun (if you know wikiology).
But, what if a well-meaning person writes a very long and very detailed 'How to' on a subject, but is fairly off the mark. If the only thing that needed editing was the part where you need to change the radio button in order to sync, then that would be how wikis work. But, this one may need a major overhaul.
Personally, while it's kind of a cool idea, I think the whole wiki instruction manual for Amazing Charts should not be written by us but rather by AC itself. I just bought TrendMicro Antivirus for my server, and the manual is 325 pages long, which I followed step by step, mind you. But, this was written by Trend Micro not by the users. I think the userboard, one of the most successful I have seen, especially if it were acted upon is the only forum we really need.
But that's just I.
