If <0.01% (that's less than 1 in 10,000 users) are problematic enough that he/she need to be exterminated, that leaves 9,999 in 10,000 users that are not problematic enough to be snuffed out.
From the PR perspective, a EULA taking aim at <0.01%, generating questions for the >99.99% remaining doesn't seem particularly effective.
I assume the >99.99% do not have any idea what that <0.01% did to deserve the sanction. If we did know, would we agree that the sanction was deserved?
This reminds me of my 3rd grade class in which one individual didn't perform an assigned task, and the whole class got punished with no PE.
