Vinny, that was awesome. I think that was what Rudyard meant.
I remember when I was with Norumbega, (yuk!). I can't remember how many meetings where we were forced to bring the USPFTF so we could decide the cutoff between 11.2 and 11.4 for anemia in a two-year-old. Hey, maybe during that time, I could be seeing a patient.
Now since I failed miserably on the feeding the elephant story, I may as well show my ignorance again. Shouldn't it be insatiable. I mean didn't the little elephant have a desire for knowledge that could not be sated or quenced?
not satiable; incapable of being satisfied or appeased: insatiable hunger for knowledge.
BTW, don't look up the words satiable or insatiable at
http://www.yourdictionary.com/satiable There seems to be a virus there. Click -- detected. I haven't looked at the virus yet to see if it is a prank, but I would think that YourDefinition.com would be rather reputable.
