Originally Posted by JBS
Originally Posted by StLawrence
I am so thoroughly confused now, I'm not even sure what everyone is talking about. I can look at the past 90 days of core measures while in the patients chart....see what I've done for that particular patient and run a report of all patients over the past 90 days. That report shows that I have met the criteria for each of the core measures and have done 4 out of 5 of the menu sets I selected.

This fits with what Donna explained above: you don't need CPT for the core measures or menu items to work.

Originally Posted by StLawrence
Then I go to the report section and try to generate a report and there is nothing there. I'm very confused about this coding issue. We do our diagnosis ICD coding and cpt coding when signing the note but we don't bill through AC. I don't understand how that matters.
This part is confusing; can you explain what you mean by "try to generate a report and there is nothing there"? You are correct: it doesn't matter if you bill through AC, so long as you enter the cpt for each encounter.

Originally Posted by StLawrence
I also don't understand the mention of the PM module when no PM module exists. Isn't that the V7 many of us are waiting for?
Adam is using the term "PM" a little differently. It is simply the portion of AC (in V4,5, or 6) that allows you to code cpt's and diagnoses, and then generate a superbill.


Having to enter CPTs into a system that we don't use is not a good use of time. It is extra work for those of use who have to enter the codes into another billing system.
If AC PM was 100% functional and had kinks worked out, we might use it. Our experience with the PM side was 3 years ago and was not helpful. Maybe it has gotten better with time.

I wish AC would not get into the pm business and just continue to hone the amazing clinical side they already have in place.


Vicki Roberts, MD
Family Medicine of Southeast Missouri
Sikeston, MO