I find it hard to believe that switching to 1gbps network made the difference; that would mean that amazing charts needs a significant amount of bandwidth to overwhelm a 100mbps connection. I have had 2 different EMRs and 2 different instances of medisoft running over the same 100mbps connection without any difficulty or latency (different versions of soapware and different versions of medisoft --each with their own VM'd database server, on the same physical server).
If it was the sole thing making the difference, either amazing charts has inherent latency issues, or your network does (and for my sake, I hope it is the latter since I am very interested in using AC in my practice)
