I wouldn't go back to paper for anything, most offices have basic computers for scheduling and billing so they are already used to the cost of hardware and support/repairs. Even though i knocked one of my laptops off the counter and it is really "toast" that sort of cost doen't compare to the cost of mainaining paper charts. We literally had an entire room with 18 metal 5 drawer filing cabinets that is now used by my MA to take vitals, give shots, draw blood etc. ( Translate: more pleasant spacious office for patients and us alike.) AND we don't have to go searching through drawers OR close the office for a week while we cull out charts that are more than 7 years old....all of the information that was in those cabinets can fit on a thumbnail drive that doesn't cost $35. I don't pay a transcriptionist, we never play the "where is the chart" game.
I love my EMR.
I hear people complaining about the lab tracking, personally I think it works very well and is much less labor intensive than the old tickler files, ditto with ordering labs, xrays,followup. I can't think of a single thing that isn't better with my EMR. Some of my colleagues who have othr EMRs are not happy....
As for AC, I am a fan. It is very functional and user friendly, actually does a whole lot more than just create a record; it improves workflow in the office. I would think for a Family Practice doc it would be top choice. Wasn't AC rated the #1 EMR by AAFP?
