If we opened more for profit schools and allowed the test/boards to weed out students instead of interviews, not only would tuition go down, but schools would be trying to make themselves better to attact the best students instead of settling for being mediocre because there are far more applicants than spots.
Scott, you lost me on that. No, seriously, can you explain it better? The main part I don't understand is it would seem to be that if you have more students than spots, the school can be more selective, correct?
