Most Recent Posts
Electronic Signature Pad for Consent Forms
by denvertech - 09/27/2026 11:12 AM
Laptops v. Desktops, what do users prefer?
by peter smith - 09/07/2026 6:42 AM
AC Billing Software
by serene - 08/31/2026 11:40 AM
Member Spotlight
Posts: 53
Joined: July 2021
Newest Members
peter smith, Christophe1776, Jun Valley Occ H, Michael Lara, DrDr
4,614 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#67113 10/05/2015 3:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
serene Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
I was afraid to upgrade to the version needed for icd10 bc of the complaints posted here and the link with our PM software may fail. We are still using 6.3.3. The doctor is coding the visits in icd9 in AC and manually looking up icd10 (in her code book) and writing it on the super bill for billing purposes only. (our super bills are scanned saved in II.)

Am I overlooking something? Still would prefer to not upgrade until these icd10 issues are worked out, especially since they seem to really effect pediatrics.

Oh we have to manually add the icd10 code to orders also. And have begrudgingly accepted this.

What do you think? Should we update now?


Serene
Office Manager
General Pediatrics
Houston, Texas
serene #67115 10/05/2015 3:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 869
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 869
I upgraded from 6.5.5 to 8.2.4. I haven't really had any major issues. It is a little slower but has some nice features.


Marty
Physician Assistant
Fullerton, CA
serene #67127 10/05/2015 7:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 2
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 2
Load a copy of AC on a non-connected computer and use it enough to see it's not the "boogie man" version.
It WORKS!

Is it slower? Slightly, but not as bad as you think
Once you see how much better ICD10 works it should be a no brainer.

Read some of the other responses here recently, people who move from 6.3.X are surprised at how well it works. Are there complaints? Sure, but it isn't that bad. It's so much better I would NEVER think of going back. LOTS of things were fixed. It is slightly slower but not that bad. You really need to try it.

There is a reason that AC pushed 8.2.4 and geared up to push


Wendell
Pediatrician in Chicago

The patient's expectation is that you have all the answers, sometimes they just don't like the answer you have for them
serene #67129 10/05/2015 8:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128
Yes, MUCH better than 6.3!


Chris
Living the Dream in Alaska
serene #67133 10/06/2015 8:54 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
Serene,

I have stayed with 6.3.3. I have trialed V8, and noted the new features, but there is nothing in it that I need. I am not doing MU any longer, nor do I bill with AC. I'll upgrade eventually, but for now, I am happier being with a known simple and fast version. I also like that I can modify/customize the diagnosis code list which cannot be done in V8.

Here is how I make it work for ICD10. I prep my charts before each visit.
1. Go to summary sheet, change all the existing diagnoses to inactive.
2. Pull up the inactive list, then click Add to bring up the code entry box. Move the code box down on the screen so you can see your list of diagnoses.
3. Search for your code.
4. When you find the ICD9 code you want, click edit code, enter the ICD10 code in the code box and save. Doing it this way does not remove your ICD9 code, but it adds your new ICD10 code with the same description. The ICD10 codes will be at the end of the list when your search thereafter since they start with letters instead of numbers. Then, add the diagnosis for the patient.
5. When you have finished this for each diagnosis, your active list will contain the diagnoses with their ICD10 codes.
6. After you have done a number of patients, you will have a good number of your common diagnoses in the code database to select, so it will be quicker to add diagnoses since you will not have to edit the ICD9s.

It takes a few minutes per patient, but you will only have to do it once for each patient.
Then your summary sheet has the ICD10 diagnoses which you can use for encounters.
When you print an order, it will have the ICD10 codes.

If you need an ICD10 code that does not exist in ICD9, use the Add button in the code list to add it. It will show up in yellow in the list since it was not modified from an existing known diagnosis. So, when a note is signed off, it will give a message about an incomplete code which can just be ignored.

If this is not clear, let me know.


Donna
serene #67141 10/06/2015 1:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
serene Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
Thanks, Donna and Wendell. I will try both your suggestions!


Serene
Office Manager
General Pediatrics
Houston, Texas
serene #67142 10/06/2015 2:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 869
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 869
Serene,

I did what Wendell suggested, I put it on a computer that we don't use and played around with it a bit before installing on the whole office system. I don't use all the features but they do have some cool features since I've upgraded from v6.5.5



Marty
Physician Assistant
Fullerton, CA
serene #67198 10/07/2015 10:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,128
Donna, fantastic idea. I will tell you that I'm glad I switched. I am really enjoying v8. It's better in so many ways. I think I'm crazy to say this, but I'm enjoying ICD-10 as well. They codes make so much more sense for common ones I use.


Chris
Living the Dream in Alaska

Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, JBS, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 156 guests, and 80 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
serene 1
Top Posters
Bert 12,908
JBS 3,002
Wendell365 2,370
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5