Most Recent Posts
Search for never seen patients
by Wendell365 - 05/07/2025 10:51 AM
No refills on Schedule 4 Meds
by koby - 05/06/2025 9:24 AM
AC Version 12.3
by Raj1 - 05/06/2025 8:52 AM
Fixing PRESCRIPTION DRUG MONITORING in Windows 11 Pro
by VTWilson - 05/01/2025 12:55 PM
An automated process failed: MedsUdates
by ChrisFNP - 04/28/2025 3:49 PM
New Feature?
by ChrisFNP - 04/22/2025 6:37 PM
Here is a new one
by ChrisFNP - 04/22/2025 6:20 PM
I won't get help because I am I
by Bert - 04/22/2025 9:09 AM
Member Spotlight
DocGene
DocGene
Cumberland, Md
Posts: 1,023
Joined: February 2011
Newest Members
It's me, Paradise Family, MedCode, MZ Medical Billi, girlfromwebpage
4,593 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 395
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 395
Hi,

Can SBS 2011 Essentials recognize a 3TB drive and use it for backup?


Gianni
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
G
Member
Offline
G
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
No it cannot. None of the Server 2008R2 series can use a 3TB drive for backup. It has to do with the way it makes backups using vmdk files. The VMDK (virtual disk) files are limited at 2TB. This limit has been removed in Server 2013.

Some Western Digital Drives have a had a custom firmware to get around this issue. Seagate does not have one.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
If you use a Linux server with a share, it will support 32TB volumes (or more if you use ext4). The disk tools will easily format the drive.

Just sayin' smile

We RAID 3TB drives for our near-line backup storage.



Indy
"Boss"

Indy's Blog

www.BestForYourPractice.com
Our Name is Our Creed
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
G
Member
Offline
G
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
Windows has no problem with using drives larger than 2TB. The problem is the VMDK limit that the server backup uses. Third party programs like Acronis don't have that problem. Downside is that they like to charge ALOT more for the server versions of their backup program. Your best best is to return the 3TB drive and get a 2TB drive.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Originally Posted by GoBruins
Hi,

Can SBS 2011 Essentials recognize a 3TB drive and use it for backup?

Apparently Sandeep are reading the question two different ways - when you say recognize, are you asking if the OS/Disk tools can mount and access the drive, or are you asking if you can write a 3TB backup image?


Indy
"Boss"

Indy's Blog

www.BestForYourPractice.com
Our Name is Our Creed
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 395
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 395
I was wondering if the SBS native backup routine could access and make backups to a 3TB drive.


Gianni
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
G
Member
Offline
G
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
I read it both ways.

1) Yes SBS can see drives larger than 2TB.
2) No it cannot backup to drives larger than 2TB unless you use a custom formatting tool. I believe Western Digital has it not Seagate.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,811
So part of it is the SBS isn't going to be be able mount the drive as-is, so you can take the drive back, or you can run a live Linux ISO/CD, and from there you can disk partition the drive into a 2 TB (or smaller) partition, with another disk of the remainder.

all tings be equal, You might be better served to get one of the inexpensive NAS drives so that you can backup across the network, which keeps the backup physically separate from the server that is being backed up.

Example being, if a room floods, or the server is snatched, the NAS is tucked away in a phone closet or some other out-of-the-way place.

Drop some other hardware in, start the restore.

If you have some old hardware, I recommend you try out Ubuntu using the Live CD - every network can use a utility server.


Indy
"Boss"

Indy's Blog

www.BestForYourPractice.com
Our Name is Our Creed
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
G
Member
Offline
G
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 2
Quote
So part of it is the SBS isn't going to be be able mount the drive as-is, so you can take the drive back, or you can run a live Linux ISO/CD, and from there you can disk partition the drive into a 2 TB (or smaller) partition, with another disk of the remainder.

This won't work as the way Windows see the physical sectors and emulates the sectors are irrelevant to how you format it. It's not a hard capacity limit that is the problem. It's the sector size.

Quote
all tings be equal, You might be better served to get one of the inexpensive NAS drives so that you can backup across the network, which keeps the backup physically separate from the server that is being backed up.

Using a NAS device in conjunction with server backup does not allow you to use incremental image back ups. The server backup utility uses block level backup which is why SBS usually hijacks the drive. If you tried it, your drive would take an image each day and fill up the drive relatively quickly.


Moderated by  ChrisFNP, DocGene, Wendell365 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 101 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
JBS 4
Bert 3
koby 3
Top Posters
Bert 12,874
JBS 2,985
Wendell365 2,366
Sandeep 2,316
ryanjo 2,084
Leslie 2,002
Wayne 1,889
This board is dedicated to the memory of Michael "Indy" Astleford. February 6, 1961 -- April 16, 2019




SiteLock
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5