One way to make this board silent is to impose a rule that we cannot talk about another EMR.
I believe other EMRs were mentioned by various posters in the past and I'm curious as to why there is outrage about this particular EMR.
AC could benefit by having a billing and practice management incorporated into the software. I, for one, agree with Vinny that ASP models are to be avoided unless one plans on having a paper copy of everything. I also worry about information that could be extracted from the web (and the liability surrounding that).
Paul has a good point about the EULA. Is AC's EULA essentially the same thing as having a ASP. Is AC a subscription? If that is the case, there may not be much legal separation between AC and ASP modeled EMR.
Nobody is inducing people to switch away from AC (now, that would be unethical).
