I think it would make more sense if the version were stable, and the one or two bugs found, which are usually found in any new release (were fixed in a patch or update).
You hit the nail on the head. I have complete lack of confidence in both version 5.1x and version 6. Some users have no problems, some are worse off to the pont of rolling back. Not something good to see with software that I literally spend 12 hours a day with.
It has also become clear as many have noted, that what was supposed to make healthcare better is going to make it worse
Not surprising, given eRx & MU were created by the same group of pea-brains that are staging the debt ceiling circus now in Washington. My dismay is that we are all represented by physician-enablers in the major medical organizations, who keep emailing me to support one or the other position.
